91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2 [2022/01/25 04:25] – created sigridundset | 91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2 [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Batch 2 | + | ====== |
- | {{ :: | ||
- | {{ :barker:2020_rail_trail_abandoned.pdf |}} | + | {{ ::barker:2020_new_england_mud_hawgs_4_22_20.pdf |Aril 22, 2020 BOT permission to Mudhawgs to operate registered ATVs on the Hillsboro-Bennington Recreational Rail Trail for maintenance only.}} |
- | {{ :barker:20170120_littleton_rail_abandonment_dred_towns_no_atvs_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:2020_rail_trail_abandoned.pdf |DOT rules for requesting a rail-trail agreement on an abandoned state-owned corridor}} |
- | {{ :barker:20170126_dot_to_littleton_te_funds_motorized_restrictions.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:20200923_dot_to_colebrook_columbia_ohrv_walking_path_request.pdf |September 23, 2020: "The Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Department of Natural & Cultural Resources (DNCR) are in receipt of your respective correspondences, |
+ | 26/Bridge Street in Colebrook." | ||
- | {{ :barker:20170421_dot_dred--motorized_restriction_dred_fund_issue.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:20201014_columbia_rail_trail_response_redacted_pi.pdf |October 14, 2020: Columbia to DOT stating their plan is for non-motorized use of rail trail}} |
- | {{ :barker:20200923_dot_to_colebrook_columbia_ohrv_walking_path_request.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:20201123_colebrook_rail_trail_response.pdf |November 23, 2020: Colebrook to DOT; hoping to decrease OHRV traffic on town roads by opening rail trail for OHRV use.}} |
- | {{ :barker:20201014_columbia_rail_trail_response_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:dot_fhwa_littleton_te_information.pdf |December 1, 1998 Littleton to Groveton line will be purchased with Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds (which preclude motorized travel. (Snowmobiles are now permitted on TE-funded trails.))}} |
- | {{ :barker:20201123_colebrook_rail_trail_response.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:20170120_littleton_rail_abandonment_dred_towns_no_atvs_redacted_pi.pdf |January 19, 2017: DOT tells Chris Gamache from BOT and Andrew Dorsett, Littleton Town Manager, that the Littleton to Bethlehem rail trail cannot be opened to OHRVs.}} |
- | {{ :barker:dot_fhwa_littleton_te_information.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:20170126_dot_to_littleton_te_funds_motorized_restrictions.pdf |January 26, 2017: Andrew Dorsett asks DOT if Littleton can buy OHRV rights from FHWA}} |
- | {{ :barker:fw_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:20170421_dot_dred--motorized_restriction_dred_fund_issue.pdf |April 21, 2017 BOT and DOT "But, now we have this issue of it being funding in part by TE funds which do not allow OHRV access. If I cannot have OHRVs on this section of rail corridor I cannot justify spending my OHRV land account funds on it. We will try to work through that issue here, but it is an issue that will be front and center in the very near future. ."}} |
- | {{ :barker:fw_rail_trail_hinsdale_nh_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:fw_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |December 19, 2019: DOT reminds Chris Gamache, (BOT) that DOT informed him and Andrew Dorsett, Littleton Town Manager in 2017 that the Littleton to Groveton rail line was TE-funded and not available for OHRV use.}} |
- | {{ :barker:fw_town_of_colebrook_railroad_corridor_letter_of_support.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:re_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |December 19, 2019 Chris Gamache (BOT) to DOT: "You guys should have been all over us about this. We have continually been talking about the uncertainty and no paperwork about it. I still want to see what DOT has in the files for this; from where to where is TE? No one can answer that question and DOT does not seem to have any old files to confirm anything about this funding. Sorry, but I going to demand to see the files for this. We still want to pull rails for snowmo use but there is no funding for it. Chris ."}} |
- | {{ :barker:fw_town_of_colebrook_railroad_corridor_letter_of_support_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |May 30 2020 communication to DNCR re Littleton Rail Trail quoting Chris Gamache (BOT) " |
- | {{ :barker:fw_town_of_columbia--request_for_meeting_re_process_for_seeking_use_of_rail_line_for_hiking_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:fw_rail_trail_hinsdale_nh_redacted_pi.pdf |October 9, 2020 DOT to Hinsdale re. tree on rail trail}} |
- | {{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:fw_town_of_colebrook_railroad_corridor_letter_of_support.pdf |November 25, 2020 Colebrook support for rail trail proposal}} |
- | {{ :barker:mx-m350n_20160816_164535_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:fw_town_of_columbia--request_for_meeting_re_process_for_seeking_use_of_rail_line_for_hiking_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |June 22, 2020: communitions re Columbia portion of proposed rail trail conversion.}} |
- | {{ :barker:new_england_mud_hawgs_atv_working_on_hillsboro_line_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:mx-m350n_20160816_164535_redacted_pi.pdf |July 6 2016: DOT permission for driveway permit in averhill}} |
- | {{ :barker:proposed_rail-trail_franklin_to_weirs_beach_economic_study_october_2019.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:new_england_mud_hawgs_atv_working_on_hillsboro_line_redacted_pi.pdf |April 22, 2020 cover email for Mudhawgs working on rail trail}} |
- | {{ :barker:re_allowing_atvs_on_the_rail_trail_for_maintenance_surveillance_work.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:proposed_rail-trail_franklin_to_weirs_beach_economic_study_october_2019.pdf |October 2019 Proposed Rail-Trail Franklin to Weirs Beach Economc Study, City of Laconia}} |
- | {{ :barker:re_beecher_falls_branch_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:re_allowing_atvs_on_the_rail_trail_for_maintenance_surveillance_work.pdf |July 23, 2020 BOT " |
+ | purposes." | ||
- | {{ :barker:re_hampton-portsmouth_26485_aka_seacoast_greenway_redacted_attorney-client_note.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:re_beecher_falls_branch_redacted_pi.pdf |July 2, 2020: DOT meeting "I would like to setup a meeting (either in-person or via Zoom) to discuss the northern limits of state ownership and NH Central use in the Colebrook-Columbia area on the Beecher Falls Branch. The Department has been approached by the towns and DNCR Bureau of Trails over the last few years (with a more recent re-inquiry) to ask about OHRV use and/or bike-ped use in Columbia & Colebrook.." |
- | {{ :barker:re_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |}} | + | {{ :barker:re_hampton-portsmouth_26485_aka_seacoast_greenway_redacted_attorney-client_note.pdf |Question on whther electric company has an underground easement on the Seacoast Greenway Rail Trail and handicapped access "In the meeting I referenced ADA-related court rulings around “Other Power Driven Motorized Vehicles” . Trails must allow folks with mobility disabilities to use OPDMDs, but the trail management entities may do an analysis of trails safety and define allowable types of OPDMDs. In the absence of such an analysis someone with a disability would be able to bring any ATV onto a trail, and determining who has a legitimate disability to allow them to do that apparently gets very sticky from an enforcement standpoint." |
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
+ | report by our local railroad operator. As you may know this line is now an active railroad year round and along with trespassing, | ||
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2.1643102720.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/08/30 07:50 (external edit)