Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2 [2022/01/25 05:45] – sigridundset
+++ 91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2 [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Batch 2
+====== Batch 2 ======
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 {{ :barker:20201123_colebrook_rail_trail_response.pdf |November 23, 2020: Colebrook to DOT; hoping to decrease OHRV traffic on town roads by opening rail trail for OHRV use.}}
-{{ :barker:dot_fhwa_littleton_te_information.pdf |December 1, 1998 Littleton to Groveton line will be purchased with Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds (which preclude motorized travel. Later, snowmobiles are permitted on TE-funded trails}}
+{{ :barker:dot_fhwa_littleton_te_information.pdf |December 1, 1998 Littleton to Groveton line will be purchased with Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds (which preclude motorized travel. (Snowmobiles are now permitted on TE-funded trails.))}}
 {{ :barker:20170120_littleton_rail_abandonment_dred_towns_no_atvs_redacted_pi.pdf |January 19, 2017: DOT tells Chris Gamache from BOT and Andrew Dorsett, Littleton Town Manager, that the Littleton to Bethlehem rail trail cannot be opened to OHRVs.}}
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 {{ :barker:re_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |December 19, 2019 Chris Gamache (BOT) to DOT: "You guys should have been all over us about this. We have continually been talking about the uncertainty and no paperwork about it. I still want to see what DOT has in the files for this; from where to where is TE? No one can answer that question and DOT does not seem to have any old files to confirm anything about this funding. Sorry, but I going to demand to see the files for this. We still want to pull rails for snowmo use but there is no funding for it. Chris ."}}
+{{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |May 30 2020 communication to DNCR re Littleton Rail Trail quoting Chris Gamache (BOT) "Future discussions will involve use management, such as possibly rerouting ATVs in some areas, the possible use of private land or roads, and coordination and commmunicating between the town and state on regulations, enforcement, marketing, and signage"..."We really need to treat this as a partnership"}}
 {{ :barker:fw_rail_trail_hinsdale_nh_redacted_pi.pdf |October 9, 2020 DOT to Hinsdale re. tree on rail trail}}
@@ Line 31: / Line 34: @@
 {{ :barker:fw_town_of_columbia--request_for_meeting_re_process_for_seeking_use_of_rail_line_for_hiking_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |June 22, 2020: communitions re Columbia portion of proposed rail trail conversion.}}
-{{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |May 30 2020 communication to DNCR re Littleton Rail Trail quoting Chris Gamache (BOT) "Future discussions will involve use management, such as possibly rerouting ATVs in some areas, the possible use of private land or roads, and coordination and commmunicating between the town and state on regulations, enforcement, marketing, and signage"..."We really need to treat this as a partnership" he said."
-"}}
 {{ :barker:mx-m350n_20160816_164535_redacted_pi.pdf |July 6 2016: DOT permission for driveway permit in averhill}}
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 {{ :barker:re_town_of_columbia--request_for_meeting_re_process_for_seeking_use_of_rail_line_for_hiking_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |August 13, 2020 DOT is working on Columbia Rail Trail process.}}
-{{ :barker:skm_364e16030415490.pdf |March 4, 2016: Claremont to FHWA requesting a waiver from the restriction fobidding OHRV use on their rail trail.}}
+{{ :barker:skm_364e16030415490.pdf |March 4, 2016: Claremont to DOT requesting a waiver from the restriction fobidding OHRV use on their rail trail.}}