User Tools

Site Tools


91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2 [2022/01/25 05:56] sigridundset91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2 [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
  
-Batch 2+====== Batch 2 ====== 
  
  
Line 26: Line 27:
 {{ :barker:re_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |December 19, 2019 Chris Gamache (BOT) to DOT: "You guys should have been all over us about this. We have continually been talking about the uncertainty and no paperwork about it. I still want to see what DOT has in the files for this; from where to where is TE? No one can answer that question and DOT does not seem to have any old files to confirm anything about this funding. Sorry, but I going to demand to see the files for this. We still want to pull rails for snowmo use but there is no funding for it. Chris ."}} {{ :barker:re_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |December 19, 2019 Chris Gamache (BOT) to DOT: "You guys should have been all over us about this. We have continually been talking about the uncertainty and no paperwork about it. I still want to see what DOT has in the files for this; from where to where is TE? No one can answer that question and DOT does not seem to have any old files to confirm anything about this funding. Sorry, but I going to demand to see the files for this. We still want to pull rails for snowmo use but there is no funding for it. Chris ."}}
  
-{{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |May 30 2020 communication to DNCR re Littleton Rail Trail quoting Chris Gamache (BOT) "Future discussions will involve use management, such as possibly rerouting ATVs in some areas, the possible use of private land or roads, and coordination and commmunicating between the town and state on regulations, enforcement, marketing, and signage"..."We really need to treat this as a partnership" he said. +{{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |May 30 2020 communication to DNCR re Littleton Rail Trail quoting Chris Gamache (BOT) "Future discussions will involve use management, such as possibly rerouting ATVs in some areas, the possible use of private land or roads, and coordination and commmunicating between the town and state on regulations, enforcement, marketing, and signage"..."We really need to treat this as a partnership"}}
-"}}+
  
 {{ :barker:fw_rail_trail_hinsdale_nh_redacted_pi.pdf |October 9, 2020 DOT to Hinsdale re. tree on rail trail}} {{ :barker:fw_rail_trail_hinsdale_nh_redacted_pi.pdf |October 9, 2020 DOT to Hinsdale re. tree on rail trail}}
91-a_to_dncr_bos_etc_regarding_ohrv_use_of_state_roads_batch_2.1643108183.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/08/30 07:51 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki