Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
communications_to_dncr_and_wmnf_re._ohrv_access_and_monitoring_and_newspaper_articles [2023/01/25 05:30] – sigridundset | communications_to_dncr_and_wmnf_re._ohrv_access_and_monitoring_and_newspaper_articles [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 |
---|
| |
{{ :ngo:2021-fs-r9-03823-f_pastoriza_redacted_release.pdf |6-9-2021: FS response to FOIA; two redacted documents}} | {{ :ngo:2021-fs-r9-03823-f_pastoriza_redacted_release.pdf |6-9-2021: FS response to FOIA; two redacted documents}} |
| |
| {{ :ngo:2022-ogc-05169-f_pastoriza_final_response.pdf |9-8-2021:FOIA to FS; "...documents written by USDA Attorney John Vandlik in 2001 and 2017 which ‘reaffirm’ Attorney Gene Erl’s 2001 opinion (attached) that the conservation easement deed for Nash Stream State Forest, in Coos County New Hampshire, gave the State of New Hampshire the right to allow Off Highway Recreational Vehicles in Nash Stream State Forest.}} |
| |
| {{ :ngo:2022-ogc-05169-f_pastoriza_responsive_record_redacted.pdf |9-8-2021: FS response.}} |
| |
| {{ :ngo:response_to_nash_stream_forest_citizen_s_committee_meeting_2021.pdf |November 20, 2021, K. Pastoriza response to Nash Stream Citizens' Committee meeting}} |
| |
{{ :ngo:request_for_meeting_re._nash_stream_altered.pdf |1-3-2022: Public request for an additional meeting of the Nash Stream Citizens' Committee and State Lands Teams to discuss ATV issues in Nash Stream}} | {{ :ngo:request_for_meeting_re._nash_stream_altered.pdf |1-3-2022: Public request for an additional meeting of the Nash Stream Citizens' Committee and State Lands Teams to discuss ATV issues in Nash Stream}} |