Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- littleton [2022/12/22 10:30] – sigridundset
+++ littleton [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 {{ :barker:dot_fhwa_littleton_te_information.pdf |December 1, 1998 Littleton to Groveton line will be purchased with Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds (which preclude motorized travel. (Snowmobiles are now permitted on TE-funded trails.))}}
+{{ ::2011_article_littleton_rail_trail_extension.pdf |2011 Caledonian Record article on Littleton Rail Trail extension. }}
 {{ :barker:20170120_littleton_rail_abandonment_dred_towns_no_atvs_redacted_pi.pdf |January 19, 2017: DOT tells Chris Gamache from BOT and Andrew Dorsett, Littleton Town Manager, that the Littleton to Bethlehem rail trail cannot be opened to OHRVs.}}
@@ Line 24: / Line 26: @@
 {{ :littleton:2019-5-3_46967_-_decision.pdf |May 3, 2019 abandonment of rail}}
-{{ :littleton:letter_from_lou_barker_Oct_25_2019_-_copy.pdf |October 25, 2019 DOT}}
+{{ :littleton:letter_from_lou_barker_Oct_25_2019_-_copy.pdf |October 25, 2019 DOT to Board of Trails and Littleton Town Manager}}
+{{:littleton:littleton_rails_to_trails_plan_has_some_concerned_about_atvs_local_news_caledonianrecord.com.pdf |November 2019: Caledonian Record article on Littleton Rail Trail public meeting. ATVs: "Everybody does not have to fear what you see up north.”}}
+[[https://indepthnh.org/2019/12/10/opinion-opposed-to-atvs-on-trails-that-subject-people-animals-to-noise-pollution/|December 10, 2019: letter to DNCR Commissioner Stewart re. ATVs on Littleton Rail Trail.]]
 {{ :barker:re_littleton_rail_abandonment_no_atv_dramatically_impacts_our_available_funding_redacted_pi.pdf |December 19, 2019 Chris Gamache (BOT) to DOT: "You guys should have been all over us about this. We have continually been talking about the uncertainty and no paperwork about it. I still want to see what DOT has in the files for this; from where to where is TE? No one can answer that question and DOT does not seem to have any old files to confirm anything about this funding. Sorry, but I going to demand to see the files for this. We still want to pull rails for snowmo use but there is no funding for it. Chris ."}}
@@ Line 32: / Line 39: @@
 {{ :barker:littleton_rail_trail_redacted_pi.pdf |May 30 2020 communication to DNCR re Littleton Rail Trail quoting Chris Gamache (BOT) "Future discussions will involve use management, such as possibly rerouting ATVs in some areas, the possible use of private land or roads, and coordination and commmunicating between the town and state on regulations, enforcement, marketing, and signage"..."We really need to treat this as a partnership"}}
-{{ :littleton:91-a_k._pastoriza.pdf |91-a to Littleton, 2022}}
+{{ ::ammonoosuc_rail_trail_12-19-2021.pdf |December 19, 2021: letter to Littleton Selectboard, DNCR and BOT re Ammonoosuc Rail Trail }}
+{{::1-5-2022_email_to_dot_and_bot_re_littleton.png?linkonly|January 15, 2022, email to DOT and Board of Trails.}}
+{{ ::february_3_2022_letter_to_dncr_fhwa_board_of_trails_and_littleton.pdf |February 3, 2022, letter to Board of Trails, DNCR, FHWA and Town of Littleton: "The Ammonoosuc Rail Trail (non-TE funded section) does  not end at Industrial Park Rd. DNCR has known this since at least 2017." }}
+{{ ::simply_would_not_be_safe_industrial_park_road.png?linkonly |April 1, 2022 "Trails Bureau does not believe the town will allow OHRV use on Industrial Park Road...It simply would not be safe."}}
+{{ :littleton:91-a_k._pastoriza.pdf |91-a to Littleton, 2022}}
 {{ :littleton:91-a_littleton_5_2022_railtrail.pdf |May 2022, 91-a to Littleton}}
@@ Line 40: / Line 54: @@
 {{:littleton:one_access_trail_posted_july_14_2022.jpg?linkonly|July 14, 2022: Access trail that appears to be on town land, posted as closed to OHRVs.}}
-{{ ::july_21_2022_response_to_fhwa.pdf |July 14, 2022, Response to FHWA}}
+{{ ::july_21_2022_response_to_fhwa.pdf |July 14, 2022, Response to FHWA,BOT, DNCR, DOT and Littleton Selectboard}}