Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- ngo_letters [2022/09/13 04:56] – sigridundset
+++ ngo_letters [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 {{ :ngo:dred_1994_nash_stream_overview.pdf |1994 DRED Nash Stream overview: " Can I use my ATV or trail bike at Nash Stream? No. Snowmobiles are the only OHRVs permitted on roads and trails specifically designated for their use; there will be no off-trail, cross country use. Mountain bicycle are allowed on established roads and trails unless otherwise noted."}}
-{{ :minority_report_atv_subcommittee_mtg_2-7-02.pdf |2-7-2002: ATV subcommittee minority report' "As you know, AMC and TNC have publicly expressed our opinion tha ATV use is inconsisent with the purposes for which Nash Stream State Forest was acquired, and with the intent and letter of the existing management plan. As members of the Nash Stream Citizens Advisory Committee, we would exect that any recommendation to DRED to allow the trail use of ATVs on Nash stream State Forest would be the result of a fair and well-informed process that considers and addresses the many issues associated with this use. Such a decision should not be inappropriately legitimized by reference to a study Committee that collected little information, identified no issues or concerns, and produced no written report that could help inform the Nash Stream Advisory committee, DRED, the legislature, or the public."}}
+{{ :minority_report_atv_subcommittee_mtg_2-7-02.pdf |2-7-2002: ATV subcommittee minority report' "As you know, AMC and TNC have publicly expressed our opinion that ATV use is inconsistent with the purposes for which Nash Stream State Forest was acquired, and with the intent and letter of the existing management plan. As members of the Nash Stream Citizens Advisory Committee, we would exect that any recommendation to DRED to allow the trail use of ATVs on Nash stream State Forest would be the result of a fair and well-informed process that considers and addresses the many issues associated with this use. Such a decision should not be inappropriately legitimized by reference to a study Committee that collected little information, identified no issues or concerns, and produced no written report that could help inform the Nash Stream Advisory committee, DRED, the legislature, or the public."}}
 {{ ::ngo:amc_tnc_spnhf_nsf_letter_2016.pdf |5-5-2016: AMC, SPNHF, TNC to CORD; "Our three organizations are writing to advise you of our deep concern about the legal status of the two existing ATV trails in Nash Stream State Forest. After careful review of the most recent Nash Stream Management Plan, as well as the existing New Hampshire statutes governing ATV trails on state lands, we conclude that the existing trails on the Nash Stream property are not in compliance with state law. "}}
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 {{ :nashmanagement:584477_final_notification_letter_for_foia_request_2022-fs-r9-02387-f.pdf |August 2, 2022: WMNF/USDA FOIA response letter}}
-{{ :nashmanagement:attorney_vukelich_letter_2022.jpg?linkonly |2022:USDS attorney Vince Vukelich to WMNF Supervisor Derek Ibarguen: "}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:attorney_vukelich_letter_2022.jpg?linkonly |2022:USDS attorney Vince Vukelich to WMNF Supervisor Derek Ibarguen: "Based on Gene Erl's opinion (which we have reaffirmed in 2001, 2017 and I reaffirm here in 2022) if the state proposes to allow cross country ATV use, we have a strong argument that right was not reserved by the State and therefore we could block that type of use."}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_road.png?linkonly |Lidar image of Kelsey Notch cross country ATV road through Nash Stream State Forest.}}
 {{ ::1_2022-fs-r9-02387-f_responsive_records.pdf |1 of 6 FOIA response re WMNF and ATVs in Nash Stream}}
@@ Line 57: / Line 59: @@
 {{ :nashmanagement:letter_to_chuck_henderson_re_terrain_august_2022.pdf |August 3, 2022: Letter to Chuck Henderson/Shaheen re. WMNF failure to respond re Nash Stream Conservation Easement}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:letter_2_to_usda_attorneys_september_2022.pdf |September 14, 2022: Kris Pastoriza to Attorney Vukelich and Attorney Vandlik, USDA/USFS}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:attorney_vulelich_usda_to_kris_pastoriza_september_14_2022.pdf |September 14, 2022: Attorney Vukelich to Kris Pastoriza}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:letter_to_attorney_v._september_2022.pdf |September 22, 2022: Kris Pastoriza To Attorney Vukelich}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:1992-8_kelsey_notch.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch 1992-1998}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_2003.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch aerial 2003. Blue dots mark Nash Stream State Forest boundary}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_2008.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch 2008}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_2009.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch 2009}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_2011.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch 2011}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_2014.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch 2014}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_2016.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch 2016}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_lidar_east.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch lidar east}}
+{{ :nashmanagement:kelsey_notch_lidar_west.png?linkonly |Kelsey Notch lidar west}}
+{{ :ngo:letter_re_nash_stream_11_2022.pdf |November 9, 2022: Kris Pastoriza to Nash Stream Forest Citizens' Committee and DNCR.}}
+{{ :ngo:nh_violates_rsa_215-a-_42.pdf |November 17, 2022: N.H. Violates RSA 215-A:42. Jamie Sayen compilation submitted to Nash Stream Citizens' Committee}}
+{{ ::concerns_raised_about_ohrvs_in_nash_stream_state_forest_local_news_caledonianrecord.com_11_28_2022.pdf |November 28, 2022: Caledonian Record, Concerns Raised about OHRVs in Nash Stream State Forest}}
+{{ :ngo:letter_to_nsfcc_11-29-22.pdf |November 29, 2022: Kris Pastoriza to Nash Stream Forest Citizens' Committee}}