Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- the_nash_stream_s.f._easement_terms_and [2022/02/27 06:34] – sigridundset
+++ the_nash_stream_s.f._easement_terms_and [2023/08/30 07:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Pertinent documents on the definition of snowmobile and OHRV ======
+ ====== Pertinent documents on the definition of snowmobile and OHRV ======
 {{ :snow:1996-3-21_dred_to_nhf_g_no_ohrvs_on_keene_rail_trail.pdf |1996: BOT to F&G; no OHRVs allowed on Keene area Rail Trail.}}
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 {{ :snow:fhwa_to_dot_2.jpg?linkonly |2-13-2007: FHWA to NH DOT; no OHRVs p. 2}}
+{{ :snow:bot_does_not_concur_with_fhwa_re_snowmobile_def.jpg?linkonly |6-20-2007: BOT does not concur with FHWA. "The issue has arisen as an unanticipated result of NH Statuatory changes which took effect in 2006"}}
 {{::snow:dred_to_dot_p_1.jpg?linkonly|7-17-2007: DRED to NH DOT; "DRED requests that the Secretary deem it appropriate for DRED to continue managing these corridors as it has since their acquisition..."}}
@@ Line 13: / Line 15: @@
 {{ :snow:dred_to_dot_p.3.jpg?linkonly |7-17-2007: DRED to NH DOT p. 3}}
-{{ :snow:bot_does_not_concur_with_fhwa_re_snowmobile_def.jpg?linkonly |2007: BOT does not concur with FHWA}}
+{{ :snow:bot_concurs_with_fhwa_re_snowmobile_def.jpg?linkonly |9-20-2007; BOT concurs with FHWA; "He (Chris Gamache BOT) agreed that given FHWA's interpretation, ATVs probably need to be banned from TE funded trails, and that DRED would re-sign such trails, banning ATV use if directed by DOT by letter."}}
+{{ :ngo:9-20-20_amc_atv_trails_memorandum.pdf |9-20-2020: Ropes and Gray memo; OHRVs and ATVs are not snowmobiles}}
-{{ :snow:bot_concurs_with_fhwa_re_snowmobile_def.jpg?linkonly |2007; BOT concurs with FHWA}}
-{{ :snow:2007_dred_opposes_use_of_te_funds_for_rail_trails.jpg?linkonly |2007: DRED opposes use of TE funds for rail purchases.}}