Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- asset_conditions_documents [2024/10/24 01:20] – sigridundset
+++ asset_conditions_documents [2025/09/01 04:20] (current) – sigridundset
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 [[Asset Condition Process (Legitimization) Guide]]
+[[Asset Condition Reviewer]]
-{{ :ac:a04_pac_asset_condition_project_forecast_overview.pdf |2024, September 12: "Asset Condition" projects forecast overview.}}
+{{ :ac:3._asset_condition_map_august_20-2025.png?linkonly |2025, August: E$ Asset Condition project map}}
-{{ :ac:letter_to_es_re_x178_information_9-2024.pdf |2024, September 9L kp letter to Eversource re. missing X-178 information}}
+{{ :ac:iso-ne_salaries_2023.png?linkonly |2023: ISO-NE salaries}}
-{{ :x178:follow_up_on_x-178f.pdf |2024, August 1:NESCOE letter to Eversource and ISO: "absent information showing that this use of consumer dollars is well-supported and reasonable, NESCOE is prepared to use its full resources to explore all available options to dispute the reasonableness of the investments, including but not limited to action at FERC."}}
+{{ :ac:asset_condition_forecast_memo_august_2025.pdf |2025, August 13: Asset Condition forecast memo}}
-{{ :ac:2024_0719_naruc_nominations_for_the_federal_and_state_current_issues_collaborative.pdf |2024, July 19: NARUC nominations for the Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative}}
+{{ :undefined:responses_to_stakeholder_comments_on_mar_2025.pdf |2025, Eversource response to comments on March 2025 "Asset Condition" project list}}
-{{ :x178:kp_email_sent_to_des_aslin_and_others_re_aot_permits_7-5-2024.pdf |2024, July 5: kp email to DES, AG and others re. lack of landowner signatures on AoT applications.}}
+{{ :ac:a04_2024_03_27_tc_ltts_phase2_supplemental_process_schedules_12_and_12c_redlines.pdf |Schedule 12 and 12c: "Upgrades, modifications or additions to the New England Transmission System shall be categorized by the ISO"}}
-[[https://acadiacenter.org/crosscurrents-issue-2/| 2024, June: Acadia Center article on X-178.]]
+{{ :ac:asset_condition_definition_nepool_counsel_memo_on_ferc_transmission_planning_and_cost_allocation_notice_inviting_comments.pdf |FERC exclusionary definition of asset condition projects}}
-{{ :ac:ct_occ_acpg_feedback.pdf |2024, June 5: CT Comments on “Joint New England Transmission Owner Asset Condition Process Guide"}}
+{{ :ac:a04_pac_asset_condition_project_forecast_overview.pdf |2024, September 12: "Asset Condition" projects forecast overview.}}
-{{ :ac:line_vision_acpg_feedback.pdf |2024, June 5: Line Vision questions on Draft Asset Condition Guide}}
+{{ :ac:letter_to_es_re_x178_information_9-2024.pdf |2024, September 9; kp letter to Eversource re. missing X-178 information}}
-{{ :ac:ma_ago_acpg_feedback.pdf |2024, June 5: MA AG feedback on the Draft Joint New England Transmission Owner Asset Condition Process Guide. "While we do not address the substance here, we note that, on May 13, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued Order No. 1920, which establishes requirements with respect to transmission planning and cost allocation, including local transmission planning inputs in the
+{{ :x178:follow_up_on_x-178f.pdf |2024, August 1: NESCOE letter to Eversource and ISO: "absent information showing that this use of consumer dollars is well-supported and reasonable, NESCOE is prepared to use its full resources to explore all available options to dispute the reasonableness of the investments, including but not limited to action at FERC."}}
-regional transmission planning process. " }}
-{{ :ac:nescoe_acpg_feedback.pdf |2024, June 5: NESCOE feedback on Draft Joint NETO Asset Condition Process Guide: "Since NESCOE first asked the NETOs to improve their asset condition processes in early 2023, the NETOs have brought $3.3 billion in asset condition projects through the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC)."}}
+{{ :ac:2024_0719_naruc_nominations_for_the_federal_and_state_current_issues_collaborative.pdf |2024, July 19: NARUC nominations for the Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative}}
+{{ :x178:kp_email_sent_to_des_aslin_and_others_re_aot_permits_7-5-2024.pdf |2024, July 5: kp email to DES, AG and others re. lack of landowner signatures on AoT applications.}}
+[[https://acadiacenter.org/crosscurrents-issue-2/| 2024, June: Acadia Center article on X-178.]]
 {{ :ac:ac_rebuilds_after_reliability_rebuilds_-_laminated_problem.pdf |2024, May 22: k pastoriza comments on mostly Eversource replacements of under 20-year-old structures.}}
 {{ :w149:comments_on_ngrid_w-149.pdf |2024, May 17: k pastoriza comments on National Grid W-149}}
+{{ :ac:a05_nepool_counsel_memo_transmission_planning_final_rule.pdf |2024, May 16: NEPOOL explaining how Order 1920 doesn't apply to "Asset Condition" projects}}
 {{ ::w149:a04_ngrid_w149_acr_asset_condition_presenation.pdf |2024, May 15: National Grid W-149 presentation $491 m. rebuild}}
 {{ :ac:letter_to_es_and_pac_re_x-178_clearance_to_ground_5-12-2024.pdf |2024, May 12: k pastoriza letter to Eversource and PAC re X-178 clearance to ground}}
-{{ :ac:comments_on_4-2024_neto_asset_condition_process_guide.pdf |2024, April 4: k pastoriza comments on NETO Asset Condition Process Guide}}
 {{ :ac:letter_to_es_re_new_plan_for_x-178_4-2024.pdf |2024, April 26: k pastoriza letter to E$, ISO re new plan for X-178}}
 {{ :ac:wetlands_violations_eversource.pdf |2024, April 26: Eversource BMP violations }}
-{{ :ac:2024_04_25_pac_asset_condition_process_guide_draft.pdf |2024, April 25: Asset Condition Process Guide Draft}}
 {{ :x178:comment_on_eversource_x-178_complete_rebuild_as_a_response_to_41_poles_out_of_580_structures_needing_repair_or_replacement_in_the_next_maintenance_cycle..pdf |2024, April 9: kp questions on Eversource Small Projects Day application to WMNF}}
@@ Line 57: / Line 59: @@
 {{ :pac:2024_03_15_pac_nescoe_feedback_line_x178.pdf |2024, March 15: NESCOE comments to PAC on Eversource X-178 presentation}}
+{{ :ac:wetlands_violations_eversource.pdf |2024, March: kp comment on Eversource wetlands violations}}
 {{ :ac:2024_02_27_pac_guidelines_for_public_comments.pdf |2024, February 27: PAC "Guidelines" for public comments}}