Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- media_articles [2024/04/20 10:10] – sigridundset
+++ media_articles [2025/02/19 04:21] (current) – sigridundset
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Media Articles ======
+{{ ::es_plans_to_continue_asset_condition_exploitation.pdf |2025, February 12: RTO Insider; Eversource plans to continue rebuilding its transmission lines}}
+[[https://indepthnh.org/2024/12/10/eversource-gets-downgrade-in-credit-rating-consumer-advocate-calls-response-a-bit-of-spin/|2024, December 11: InDepthNH, Eversource credit rating downgraded]]
+{{ :ac:2024-12-6_utility_dive_ferc_penalty_bad_data.pdf |2024, December 6: Utility Dive; "“PSE&G to pay $6.6M for inaccurately reporting need for local PJM transmission project The Public Service Enterprise Group utility didn’t give PJM accurate information about the need for a $546 million power line it built in New Jersey, per a FERC settlement." }}
+{{ :ac:2024-11-20_utility_dive_asset_condition_problem.pdf |2024, November 20: Utility Dive; "Local transmission spending soars nationwide amid ‘serious absence of cost containment'"}}
+{{ ::11-19-2024_nbc-ct_on_x-178.pdf |2024, November 19: NBC-CT article on X-178}}
+{{ :x178:portland_press_herald_article_8-22-2024.pdf |2024, August 22: Portland Press Herald; "Mainers could pay $32 million for grid upgrade in New Hampshire"}}
+[[https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/ratepayers-for-utility-justice|2024, August 20: Common Dreams; Ratepayers for utility justice.]]
+{{ :x178:20240816_cane_letter_to_eversource_re_x_178_with_signatures_final.pdf |2024, August 19: Consumer Advocates of New England letter to Eversource re.X-178}}
+{{ :x178:20240816_cane_press_release_re_x-178_eversource_project_final.pdf |2024, August 16: Consumer Advocates of New England press release re. X-178}}
+[[https://indepthnh.org/2024/08/19/transmission-projects-costing-billions-flow-directly-to-ratepayers-bills/|2024, August 19: InDepthNH, Suit against Eversource, ISO-NE and FERC]]
+{{ :x178:2024-8-12_caledonian_record_x-178.pdf |2024, August 12: Caledonian-Record article on X-178; NESCOE letter and SEC.}}
+[[https://acadiacenter.org/crosscurrents-issue-2/| 2024, June: Acadia Center article on X-178 "proposed" asset condition rebuild]]
 [[https://www.utilitydive.com/news/eversource-national-grid-iso-new-england-ferc-asset-condition-transmission-maine/706393/|2024, February 2; Utility Dive, "Eversource, others may be capitalizing on lax reviews for some transmission projects: Maine officials"]]
@@ Line 23: / Line 47: @@
 [[https://www.utilitydive.com/news/FERC-independent-transmission-monitor-itm-Southern-Company/633592/| 2022, October 7: Utility Dive "About 63% of transmission investment in California over the last three years was on “repair and replacement” projects that are self-approved by the state’s three major investor-owned utilities."]]
-{{ :ac:wired_group_asset_condition_problem_2.pdf |2020: Wired Group 2}}
+{{ :ac:wired_group_asset_condition_problem_2.pdf |2020, September: Wired Group 2}}
 {{ :ac:asset_condition_problem_wired_group.pdf |2020, August: Wired Group}}
+[[https://www.cleveland.com/opinion/2017/12/to_avoid_skyrocketing_electric.html| 2017, December 31: Cleveland Opinion. To Avoid Skyrocketing Electric Costs FERC scrutiny of 'supplemental' projects is needed]]