ferc_complaint_el25-44
This is an old revision of the document!
FERC Complaint EL25-44
2025, April 24: NESCOE response to ISO-NE motion to dismiss
2025, March 20: NESCOE comments; "As described
supra in § III.B, recently proposed projects such as the X-178 Line Rebuild and the HPFF cable
replacement project in Boston should be subject to a regional planning process. These projects,
unlike an emergency asset replacement,81 result in extremely significant investments that can
impact the regional planning process and could be regionally planned without putting reliability
at risk."
2025, March 18: Maine PUC comments; "While Eversource provided several presentations regarding Line X-178, stakeholders noted issues with a lack of compelling evidence to support the scope of the project (complete rebuild) and lack of responsiveness to stakeholder comments and
questions."
Motion for leave an answer
Petition to intervene
2025, March 20: Industrial Energy Complaint-Protest
2025, March 20: ISO-NE Motion to Dismiss and answer
2025, March 20: PIO Comments
..."2023, March 20: New England Transmission Owners motion to dismiss and answer
2025, March 25: FEA Transmission complaint and comments
2025, March 15: RMI Comments
2025, March 18: Maine PUC Notice of Intervention and Protest
2024, December 19: "Complainants identify a valid and persistent issue: the lack of meaningful review of asset condition1 projects. As noted by the Complainants, this issue is pervasive in New England, where asset condition projects are solely within the transmission providers discretion..."
ferc_complaint_el25-44.1751268632.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/06/30 03:30 by sigridundset
