Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- x-178 [2025/06/22 04:32] – sigridundset
+++ x-178 [2025/09/24 03:59] (current) – sigridundset
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 [[White Mountain National Forest documents]]
-{{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_national_grid_materials.pdf |2025, June 18: Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}}
-{{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_ctc_global_material.pdf |2025, June 18: Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}}
+{{ :x178:lost_river_logging_comment_2_9-20-2025.pdf |2025, September 20: Comment to Forest Service on X-178 rebuild and Lost River Logging and Clearcut project.}}
+{{ :x178:20240131-5415_me_advocate_protest_w-attachments.pdf |2024, January 31: Maine Advocate protest to FERC with attachments}}
+{{ :x178:ferc_orders_new_england_transmission_owners_to_give_more_info_on_upgrade_projects_utility_dive.pdf |2025, September 19: Utility Dive: FERC orders Eversource and others to give more information on "Asset Condition" projects.}}
+{{ :x178:comment_to_fs_september_17_2025_x-178.pdf |2025, September 7: Comment to Forest Service on its proposed Categorical Exclusion from NEPA review.}}
+{{ :x178:x178-2-construction-permit-maps.pdf |2025, August 20: new X-178-2 phase II ground construction maps not given to the Forest Service.}}
+{{ :x178:letterhead_fs_comments_august_7_2025_final.pdf |2025, August 7: letter to Forest Service re. Categorical Exclusion}}
+[[https://indepthnh.org/2025/07/06/op-ed-pastoriza-criticizes-transmission-line-rebuild/| 2025, July 6: InDepthNH article on WMNF use of Categorical Exclusion to avoid NEPA assessement of the X-178.]]
+{{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_national_grid_materials.pdf |2025, June 18: National Grid; Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}}
+{{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_ctc_global_material.pdf |2025, June 18: CTC Global; Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}}
 {{ :x178:2025_06_10_nescoe_ac_reviewer_priorties_memo.pdf |2025, June 10: NESCOE backs ISO-NE as "independent" entity to assess Asset Condition projects. ISO claims it has no regulatory power over asset condition projects}}
@@ Line 35: / Line 50: @@
 {{ :x178:project_information_form_-_eversource_x178-2_transmission_line_rebuild.pdf  |2025, March 26 (posted. Approved for consideration August 19, 2024): Forest Service proposed to give Eversource a Categorical Exclusion from NEPA requirements for an environmental assessment of Eversource's proposed X-178 line replacement, road and crane mesa construction in the Kinsman and Gordon Pond Roadless areas of White Mountain National Forest}}
+{{ ::20250318-5062_mpuc_notice_of_intervention_and_protest_el25-44.pdf |2025, March 18: Maine PUC cites the X-178 as an example of the lack of meaningful review of Asset Condition projects, in FERC docket EL25-44}}
 {{ :x178:24-087-2025-04-14-nhpuc-proc-order-re-mot-to-amend-pet-and-establish-proc-sched-1.pdf |2025, April 14: PUC schedule for Eversource petition for an exemption from Bethlehem's structure height restrictions}}
@@ Line 46: / Line 62: @@
 {{ :x178:03142025_178-2_withdrawal_email.pdf |2025, March 14: Eversource withdraws DES permit requests for geotechnical boring in WMNF.}}
+{{ ::20250318-5062_mpuc_notice_of_intervention_and_protest_el25-44.pdf |2025, March 18: Maine PUC cites the X-178 as an example of the lack of meaningful review of Asset Condition projects, in FERC docket EL25-44}}
 {{ :x178:2024-02-2025-03-17-sec-order-ruling-proposed-x-178-trans-line-constitues-sizable-addition.pdf |2025, March 17: SEC Order taking jurisdiction of Eversource's proposed X-178 project.}}
@@ Line 650: / Line 668: @@
 {{ :x178:x-178_eversource_longline_submittal.pdf |2015, July: PAR submittal: "If this project is awarded, PAR will longline several individuals into a ROW in order to cut up left over structure pieces and debris so they can be removed by the aircraft. Due to the lack of access, workers will need to be lowered into the ROW via longline...Workers will be transferred into different locations along an 8 mile stretch of ROW
 being inserted and extracted by longline."}}
+{{ :x178:2015_e_to_easton_re_x-178_pole_removal_-1.pdf |2015, February 10:Eversource to Easton re. pole removal}}
 {{ :x178:eversource_transmission_line_valuation_easton_001.jpg?linkonly |2014: Eversource valuation of ROW and infrastructure in Easton}}