| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| x-178 [2025/06/22 04:32] – sigridundset | x-178 [2025/08/07 12:38] (current) – sigridundset |
|---|
| [[White Mountain National Forest documents]] | [[White Mountain National Forest documents]] |
| |
| {{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_national_grid_materials.pdf |2025, June 18: Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}} | [[https://indepthnh.org/2025/07/06/op-ed-pastoriza-criticizes-transmission-line-rebuild/| 2025, July 6: InDepthNH article on WMNF use of Categorical Exclusion to avoid NEPA assessement of the X-178.]] |
| |
| {{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_ctc_global_material.pdf |2025, June 18: Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}} | {{ ::20250318-5062_mpuc_notice_of_intervention_and_protest_el25-44.pdf |2025, March 18: Maine PUC cites the X-178 as an example of the lack of meaningful review of Asset Condition projects, in FERC docket EL25-44}} |
| | |
| | {{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_national_grid_materials.pdf |2025, June 18: National Grid; Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}} |
| | |
| | {{ :x178:2025_06_18_gets_ctc_global_material.pdf |2025, June 18: CTC Global; Eversource's standard ACSS conductor is a 1970s vintage conductor, not an advanced conductor}} |
| |
| {{ :x178:2025_06_10_nescoe_ac_reviewer_priorties_memo.pdf |2025, June 10: NESCOE backs ISO-NE as "independent" entity to assess Asset Condition projects. ISO claims it has no regulatory power over asset condition projects}} | {{ :x178:2025_06_10_nescoe_ac_reviewer_priorties_memo.pdf |2025, June 10: NESCOE backs ISO-NE as "independent" entity to assess Asset Condition projects. ISO claims it has no regulatory power over asset condition projects}} |
| {{ :x178:x-178_eversource_longline_submittal.pdf |2015, July: PAR submittal: "If this project is awarded, PAR will longline several individuals into a ROW in order to cut up left over structure pieces and debris so they can be removed by the aircraft. Due to the lack of access, workers will need to be lowered into the ROW via longline...Workers will be transferred into different locations along an 8 mile stretch of ROW | {{ :x178:x-178_eversource_longline_submittal.pdf |2015, July: PAR submittal: "If this project is awarded, PAR will longline several individuals into a ROW in order to cut up left over structure pieces and debris so they can be removed by the aircraft. Due to the lack of access, workers will need to be lowered into the ROW via longline...Workers will be transferred into different locations along an 8 mile stretch of ROW |
| being inserted and extracted by longline."}} | being inserted and extracted by longline."}} |
| | |
| | {{ :x178:2015_e_to_easton_re_x-178_pole_removal_-1.pdf |2015, February 10:Eversource to Easton re. pole removal}} |
| |
| {{ :x178:eversource_transmission_line_valuation_easton_001.jpg?linkonly |2014: Eversource valuation of ROW and infrastructure in Easton}} | {{ :x178:eversource_transmission_line_valuation_easton_001.jpg?linkonly |2014: Eversource valuation of ROW and infrastructure in Easton}} |
